There is no such thing as “natural multiplicity”. Some of you are mentally ill, and I’m sorry to hear that. Most of you are bored teenagers who grew up on anime and Fight Club.
Do you see this delicious looking hat? My grandma made it for me. I love her dearly, but thanks to arthritis she hasn’t been able to knit for some time now. This hat is an irreplaceable family heirloom. Show me some proof that “natural multiplicity” is a real thing, outside of mental illness, and I’ll eat it. I’ll turn on my webcam and devour it, then I’ll post the video on Youtube with a link to it here.
A peer reviewed study would suffice. Just don’t send me to one of your blogs. I’ve read your empty rhetoric. Personal experience doesn’t satisfy a legal, let alone a scientific, standard of evidence.
Well, you’re in luck, my friend, because I’ve been on a kick lately scouring academic articles for references to non-disordered multiplicity!
You can find my current main two results here and here.
While people are still waiting on evidence of endogenic multiplicity, I’m still waiting on that peer-reviewed literature supporting the existence of singularity. Hell, I’m still waiting on psychiatrists to prove the mind even exists at all. I honestly can’t call this stuff science with a straight face. And, yet, it’s no less valid than if it were. -Liberty & Serenity
Discussion ¬