clarification – Mordax et al

Posts Tagged clarification

2 results.

So it’s socially acceptable for women to go pants-less?

by admin on April 14, 2014 at 2:27 am

It is socially acceptable for anyone to ‘go pants-less’ assuming the length of the dress or tunic reaches the middle of the hip/thigh area. I would liken this to wearing a daringly cut miniskirt in terms of length– not however[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…

└ Tags: Anonymous, carapaces, clarification, clothes, derse, homestuck, pants, prospit

Comment

Is going shirtless considered risque? How about no pants plus shirt?

by admin on April 14, 2014 at 2:25 am

Posted In: Uncategorized

I may need some clarification about what you mean here, because when I read ‘no pants and no shirt’ what I understand is ‘naked’. It is socially unacceptable for Dersite to appear naked in public. It would be considered either[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…

└ Tags: Anonymous, carapacians, clarification, clothes, derse, eroticism, homestuck, prospit

Comment

Mordax et al

Posts Tagged clarification

So it’s socially acceptable for women to go pants-less?

Is going shirtless considered risque? How about no pants plus shirt?

Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Archives

Categories

Meta