Posts Tagged did

7 results.

( No Title )

by on November 21, 2016 at 6:06 am
Posted In: Uncategorized

Heads up that Split, the new M. Night Shyamalan movie which is coming out and starting to get reviews, is another in a long, dissapointingly cliche line of films where every multiple and/or person with DID is apparently a serial[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…

└ Tags: , , , , , , , ,
 Comment 

So a couple questions; 1. The fuck is a soulbound, I tried looking it up, I’m finding no source for what it is. 2. How do you spontaneously integrate? Like, that shit takes time, how do you just delete everything? 3. How are you the legitimate reincarnation of fictional characters, does that make any other kin of them invalid? Also. If natural multiplicity was a thing, and you legitimately had people in your head, you do need help, just like someone with DID, DDNOS, schizo, or anything else.

by on May 23, 2016 at 3:02 am
Posted In: Uncategorized

1. Soulbonds are the spirits of fictional characters or other extraplanar entities that share headspace with people in this word (called soulbonding). It is generally a form of channeling/mediumship but it can be experienced similarly to multiplicity when bonds frequently[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…

└ Tags: , , ,
 Comment 

Hey, you said in your bio that you suffered child abuse and such. Ever think that you multiplicity could actually be trauma based?

by on May 23, 2016 at 2:55 am
Posted In: Uncategorized

Its possible, certainly. However, I have rarely experienced distress caused by being a multiple/having headmates, so I don’t want to call it a disorder and take up space and resources for those who actually experience their multiplicity as a disorder,[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…

└ Tags: , , , ,
 Comment 

you do realize that by blantantly ignoring DID and OSDD-1 systems when talking about multiplicity that you are being really fucking ableist, right? that’s like talking about being transgender and ignoring nonbinary people or something.

by on May 22, 2016 at 11:43 pm
Posted In: Uncategorized

Dude, when am I fucking ignoring DID/OSDD systems??? O_o Asking for DID/OSDD systems not to actively insult, humiliate, invalidate, and deny the existence of non-DID/OSDD systems is not “ignoring” those systems.

└ Tags: , , , , ,
 Comment 

( No Title )

by on May 22, 2016 at 11:21 pm
Posted In: Uncategorized

Here is some social evidence that non-DID multiples have existed and engaged in community with DID multiples prior to the year 1995. http://faqs.cs.uu.nl/na-dir/dissoc-faq/part1.htmlhttp://faqs.cs.uu.nl/na-dir/dissoc-faq/part2.htmlhttp://faqs.cs.uu.nl/na-dir/dissoc-faq/part3.htmlhttp://faqs.cs.uu.nl/na-dir/dissoc-faq/part4.html Since I realize that’s a lot to read through, here are some choice highlights. Do not suggest[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…

└ Tags: , , ,
 Comment 

Same anon who asked about systems. I’m familiar with DID, but what’s a “multiple,” “natural multiple,” and a “mental collective”? And how is a “mental collective” different from a “system”?

by on January 27, 2016 at 10:11 am
Posted In: Uncategorized

A multiple is any person, either one with DID or not, who habitually shares their mind and body with other persons/personalities/entities. A mental collective is new word. Previously all multiples, both DID and non-DID used the term system. A mental[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…

└ Tags: , , , , ,
 Comment